News

Newsletter & events signup

Click the heading above to sign up to our monthly newsletter and receive invitations to upcoming events.

Please fill in the fields below to receive our monthly newsletter and invitations to upcoming events.






    Domain Names at Risk for Both Franchisors and Offshore Entities

    By Devin Elliott, Law Graduate 1 – The New Rules Impacting Offshore Entities Under the old rules, offshore entities with no Australian connection could register any domain name in the .com.au and .net.au name spaces, provided they held or applied for an Australian trade mark registration. For example, the owner of the registered trade mark…

    Landlord’s consent to sublease request: A case update (Victoria)

    The recent appeal decision in Aventus Cranbourne Thompson Road Pty Ltd v Home Consortium Leasehold Pty Ltd1 (Aventus) places a spotlight on the right to sublease premises under a commercial lease, particularly on what amounts to “permitted use”, and to a lesser extent what amounts to “unreasonably withholding consent” by the landlord.

    Federal Industrial Relations Bill Passed by Parliament

    On 18 March 2021, Parliament passed the Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia’s Jobs and Economic Recovery) Bill 2020 minus a number of provisions that were proposed in the first reading version of the Bill. Key amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 as a result of the Bill surround the imposition of an obligation on employers to make an offer to convert casual employees to permanent employees if certain criteria are met. The Bill therefore has wide reaching implications for employers of casual staff.

    When is an agreement a franchise agreement? – Freedom Foods Pty Ltd v Blue Diamond Growers

    In Freedom Foods Pty Ltd v Blue Diamond Growers [2021] FCA 172, the Federal Court of Australia was asked to ascertain if an agreement could be classified as “franchise agreement” and thus avoid the application of an arbitration dispute resolution clause and if a matter concerning Australian Law, namely claims of misleading and deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct, was suitable to be heard through an arbitration in California. This case illustrates the importance of understanding your rights in agreements in respect of dispute resolution and whether agreements not identified as relating to franchises can be classified as “franchising agreements”.